{"id":15921,"date":"2020-01-30T00:02:54","date_gmt":"2020-01-30T05:02:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/?p=15921"},"modified":"2020-01-30T03:51:22","modified_gmt":"2020-01-30T08:51:22","slug":"brick-zoning-board-approves-part-of-camp-osborn-rebuild-but-a-judge-will-ultimately-decide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2020\/01\/brick-zoning-board-approves-part-of-camp-osborn-rebuild-but-a-judge-will-ultimately-decide\/","title":{"rendered":"Brick Zoning Board Approves Part of Camp Osborn Rebuild, But A Judge Will Ultimately Decide"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_12614\" style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-12614\" class=\"size-large wp-image-12614\" src=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-1024x524.jpg\" alt=\"A rendering of proposed homes for the rebuilt Camp Osborn neighborhood. (Photo: Daniel Nee)\" width=\"640\" height=\"328\" srcset=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-1024x524.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-400x205.jpg 400w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-768x393.jpg 768w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-821x420.jpg 821w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-640x327.jpg 640w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592-681x348.jpg 681w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-12614\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A rendering of proposed homes for the rebuilt Camp Osborn neighborhood. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Brick Township\u2019s zoning board on Wednesday night unanimously granted the final approval to a developer to move ahead with the construction of seven homes where 30 once stood prior to Superstorm Sandy. But with litigation over the project already in progress, a judge will ultimately decide whether the board\u2019s decision will stand.<\/p>\n<p>The developer, RTS IV, LLC, plans to construct 13 homes on the plot of land formerly owned by Bob Osborn. The homes will be constructed on the southernmost portion of the property, which was once operated by Osborn under a land lease system wherein residents owned their homes but rented the land from Osborn. Osborn originally proposed 13 homes which would be privately owned \u2013 a project approved by the board \u2013 but died during the course of litigation which followed. His heirs sold the land to a North Jersey developer.<\/p>\n<p>The litigation has been brought on by a single neighbor on Lyndhurst Drive who is opposed to what he sees as too dense a project. While the number of homes was reduced from over 30 before the storm to just seven, the objector, who is identified only as JSTAR, LLC in court documents, is seeking strict enforcement of the area\u2019s zoning, which calls for 7,500 square foot lots for each home. Under that zoning, only three or four homes can be built on the site.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you grant the final approval, it will be subject to what happens in any one of those pieces of litigation,\u201d board attorney Ronald Cucchiaro told members before the vote.<\/p>\n<p>Attorney Dina Vicari, representing the objector, had little to say since the matter was largely a technicality because it was previously recommended the board take separate votes on preliminary and final approval for the project. Preliminary approval had already been granted, and the developer, represented by attorney John Jackson, was tasked with certifying that there were no significant changes from the preliminary resolution of approval.<\/p>\n<p>Vicari did say her client was interested in detailed lighting and landscaping plans for the project.<\/p>\n<p>There are multiple pending actions referencing the plot of land, and it is unknown when a court will uphold or vacate the board\u2019s decision. Previously, the court rejected the 13-home proposal under the doctrine of \u201crezoning by variance,\u201d which prevents zoning boards from granting variances for projects that are too different from the underlying zone in which a property is located.<\/p>\n<div class=\"fcbkbttn_buttons_block\" id=\"fcbkbttn_left\"><div class=\"fb-share-button fcbkbttn_large_button \" data-href=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2020\/01\/brick-zoning-board-approves-part-of-camp-osborn-rebuild-but-a-judge-will-ultimately-decide\/\" data-type=\"button_count\" data-size=\"large\"><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brick Township\u2019s zoning board on Wednesday night unanimously granted the final approval to a developer to move ahead with the construction of seven homes where 30 once stood prior to Superstorm Sandy. But with litigation over the project already in progress, a judge will ultimately decide whether the board\u2019s decision will stand. The developer, RTS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2,14],"tags":[24,501],"class_list":["post-15921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-government","category-superstorm-hurricane-sandy","tag-brick-nj-news","tag-camp-osborn"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/IMG_0592.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgt2Ft-48N","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15921\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}