{"id":5036,"date":"2015-06-16T05:29:06","date_gmt":"2015-06-16T09:29:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/?p=5036"},"modified":"2015-06-16T13:23:45","modified_gmt":"2015-06-16T17:23:45","slug":"jobs-of-24-brick-school-bus-drivers-in-limbo-as-layoff-notice-will-be-filed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2015\/06\/jobs-of-24-brick-school-bus-drivers-in-limbo-as-layoff-notice-will-be-filed\/","title":{"rendered":"Jobs of 24 Brick School Bus Drivers in Limbo As Layoff Notice Will Be Filed"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_5037\" style=\"width: 628px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248.jpg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5037\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5037\" src=\"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248-1024x681.jpg\" alt=\"Greg Cohen, a Brick school bus driver and union leader, addresses the Board of Education June 15, 2015. (Photo: Daniel Nee)\" width=\"618\" height=\"411\" srcset=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248-240x160.jpg 240w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248-400x266.jpg 400w, https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248-600x399.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 618px) 100vw, 618px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-5037\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Greg Cohen, a Brick school bus driver and union leader, addresses the Board of Education June 15, 2015. (Photo: Daniel Nee)<\/p><\/div>The Brick Township school district has found itself caught between a rock and a hard place, with school board members seeking to save bus drivers\u2019 jobs despite making the decision in April to approve a budget that sheds 31 positions.<\/p>\n<p>A nearly five hour-long special meeting of the board was held Monday night that was essentially a repeat of a meeting held last month where the issue of bus driver layoffs was brought up. Drivers attended Monday night\u2019s meeting en masse, and for the second time in several weeks, told board members that there are numerous management issues that bring down morale, complicate bus routes and make drivers\u2019 jobs more difficult while delaying students getting to and from school.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think more time should have been spent researching this,\u201d John Menshon, president of Transport Workers Union Local 225 Branch 4, the union which represents the district\u2019s drivers, told board members. \u201cHow do you pass a budget and not know what\u2019s in it?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Board members said they were given poor information on absenteeism rates and other issues by management in the district\u2019s transportation department and used that information in favoring a restructuring of the department which includes the staff cuts.<\/p>\n<p>Nicole Pappalardo, a supervisory bus driver, said cutting bus drivers would only make a bad situation in the district worse.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s stressful, it\u2019s frustrating,\u201d Pappalardo said. \u201cWe can\u2019t even speak by the time we get home at night with the way things are being run.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As more bus drivers spoke at the meeting, board members seemed to be convinced that at least some layoffs should be avoided. But that led to a discussion on a serious problem: the district\u2019s 2015-16 budget includes more than $1 million in savings stemming from the layoffs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Difficult, Drawn-Out Decisions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Some layoffs may be inevitable. According to state law, school districts must work with a regional education commission to price bus runs for out-of-district private and parochial schools, as well as out-of-district vocational schools and county academies. Brick has often used its own drivers to bus students in these scenarios in the past.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe were called out on this by the county superintendent,\u201d said Interim Superintendent Rich Caldes.<\/p>\n<p>If Brick\u2019s drivers can provide transportation for students cheaper than a contractor hired by the Monmouth-Ocean Educational Services Commission, the Brick drivers can continue to bus those students. But if MOESC beats Brick\u2019s cost, contractors must be used in order to save taxpayer dollars, the law states.<\/p>\n<p>In all, 11 bus drivers\u2019 jobs would be eliminated if MOESC comes through with a lower price of out-of-district transportation. Whether or not those 11 drivers will be able to be retained will not be known until MOESC notifies Brick school officials of the transportation rates for its routes, which is not expected until the end of July.<\/p>\n<p>The issue the district was facing going into Monday\u2019s meeting was whether layoff notices should be filed against the 24 drivers whose jobs may be in jeopardy, between the out-of-district runs and what would be condensed in-district runs under the 2015-16 budget. If all 24 drivers were to be retained, the district would not have the money to fund their salaries and benefits since the budget passed by the board and approved by the county and state did not include them.<\/p>\n<p>At one point during the meeting, board member John Barton made a motion stating that the layoff plan should be tabled and not filed with the state Civil Service Commission until a seventh board member is appointed by the county superintendent to take the place of John Talty, who resigned due to health reasons. Barton\u2019s motion was seconded by board member Frank Pannucci, Jr.<\/p>\n<p>The motion, board attorney Jack Sahradnik said, may have been effectively illegal, since the board does not have the power to compel the district\u2019s appointing authority \u2013 in Brick\u2019s case, the human resources director \u2013 from filing the layoff plan with the state if the district truly could not pay the salaries of the employees in question.<\/p>\n<p>Business Administrator James Edwards said if the layoff plan was not filed, the drivers would have to be retained even if the district did not have enough money to pay them. In that case, he said, he could not certify the district\u2019s financial well-being with the county and state, which would most likely lead to a state monitor taking over the Brick district.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you get through the process and nothing changes by the end of that period, by that point in time you\u2019ll be having expenses you have to fund that are not in the budget,\u201d said Sahradnik.<\/p>\n<p>State monitors are appointed to oversee the business of struggling school districts, such as Lakewood. The monitor would effectively put the district under the control of the state, and would be able to overrule the local school board, business administrator and even educational decisions made by the superintendent.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen I can\u2019t give you that certification, we start getting into the grounds of the state Commissioner of Education appointing a monitor,\u201d said Edwards, of a case in which the layoff plan was not filed. \u201cThere are too many variables at this point in our budget to tell you in June that we have enough money to make it until the following June.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a responsibility to do what\u2019s ethically and legally correct,\u201d said Caldes. \u201cWe are putting ourselves in jeopardy at some point.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Realizing the dire nature of the situation, Barton rescinded his motion even though he had \u201ctwo other people ready to vote with me.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI wouldn\u2019t want to do that to the district and bring that kind of attention to the school system,\u201d said Barton. \u201cIt\u2019s not very classy to do that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf a state monitor were to come in, there would be even less of a chance of saving any jobs,\u201d said Pannucci, who rescinded his seconding of Barton\u2019s motion to hold off on filing the layoff plan. \u201cAn absolutely zero chance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The layoff plan, Edwards said, should have been filed with the state May 1. It will likely be filed now, though just because a layoff plan is filed does not mean it must be acted upon. If the district is able to find savings through negotiations with the TWU, allocate additional funds or learn that the district can provide out-of-district transportation cheaper than MOESC\u2019s contractor, jobs can be saved regardless of the layoff plan, which represents the maximum number of positions that can be eliminated.<\/p>\n<p>Monday\u2019s meeting provided little in the way of answers to bus drivers who are worried about their jobs, though board members seemed committed to looking into the issue further and reworking the layoff plan.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNone of us up here want to see any of you lose your jobs,\u201d Board President Sharon Cantillo said.<\/p>\n<div class=\"fcbkbttn_buttons_block\" id=\"fcbkbttn_left\"><div class=\"fb-share-button fcbkbttn_large_button \" data-href=\"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/2015\/06\/jobs-of-24-brick-school-bus-drivers-in-limbo-as-layoff-notice-will-be-filed\/\" data-type=\"button_count\" data-size=\"large\"><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Brick Township school district has found itself caught between a rock and a hard place, with school board members seeking to save bus drivers\u2019 jobs despite making the decision in April to approve a budget that sheds 31 positions. A nearly five hour-long special meeting of the board was held Monday night that was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5037,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[13],"tags":[24,1356,1353,1317],"class_list":["post-5036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brick-schools","tag-brick-nj-news","tag-bus-drivers","tag-layoffs","tag-school-bus-drivers"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/DSC_0248.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgt2Ft-1je","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5036\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shorebeat.com\/brick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}